Expanding PrEP Access: A Critical Step in HIV Prevention for Black and Rural Communities

In a major stride for HIV prevention, the Biden administration announced recently that long-acting injectable PrEP, sold as Apretude by ViiV Healthcare, will now be covered without cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This policy shift is significant in making HIV prevention tools more accessible. However, for many Black Americans and those living in rural areas, barriers to healthcare persist, limiting the full potential of this policy change.

The Disparity in Access to PrEP

While this new policy represents progress, the reality is that Black people—who are disproportionately affected by HIV—are still underrepresented among those using PrEP. Despite making up over 40% of new HIV diagnoses in the U.S., only about 11% of PrEP users are Black, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These numbers reveal the systemic barriers that exist: financial challenges, healthcare access gaps, and lingering stigma that keep many from obtaining life-saving medication.

In States Like Georgia, Where Medicaid Has Yet to Expand, HIV Rates Remain Alarmingly High

In states like Georgia, where Medicaid has yet to expand under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), HIV infection rates remain among the highest in the nation. The consequences of this policy decision are staggering. According to the most recent CDC surveillance data from 2023, Georgia reported over 2,674 new HIV diagnoses, placing it at the forefront of the ongoing HIV epidemic in the United States.

Despite widespread advances in treatment, Georgia’s healthcare system continues to face significant challenges, particularly in achieving viral suppression among its population living with HIV. Roughly 72% of people living with HIV in the state have not reached viral suppression, a rate well above the national average of 58%. This failure not only heightens the risk of HIV transmission but also places Georgia’s most vulnerable populations in an untenable situation.

The city of Atlanta, in particular, bears the brunt of this crisis. Recent data from the CDC, the Georgia Department of Public Health, and AIDSVu place Atlanta as third in the nation for the highest number of people living with HIV, trailing only Miami and New York City. In specific communities, particularly those with large Black and Brown populations, infection rates are comparable to those seen in regions of sub-Saharan Africa. In some areas of Atlanta, the prevalence of HIV mirrors the situation in countries like South Africa or Eswatini, where access to healthcare resources remains limited and the virus continues to pose significant public health challenges.

In contrast, states like Louisiana, which expanded Medicaid in 2016, have seen significant improvements in their public health outcomes related to HIV. Louisiana’s experience demonstrates the impact that Medicaid expansion can have on populations affected by HIV. According to the Louisiana Department of Health, viral suppression rates in the state rose from 63% in 2016 to 82% by 2022, and new diagnoses dropped by 20%. Louisiana’s expansion allowed thousands more residents to access crucial services, including PrEP—pre-exposure prophylaxis, a life-saving medication that helps prevent HIV transmission.

However, in Georgia, thousands of residents remain uninsured and unable to afford these same preventative measures. The failure to adopt Medicaid expansion in the state has created a vacuum in the healthcare system, leaving vulnerable populations without the necessary tools to protect themselves or manage their conditions. This gap in coverage disproportionately affects Georgia’s Black and Brown communities, where socioeconomic factors exacerbate existing health disparities.

The lack of access to PrEP in Georgia is especially concerning. PrEP has been widely recognized as one of the most effective tools in preventing HIV transmission, but without access to affordable healthcare, many Georgians are unable to benefit from it. In states that have embraced Medicaid expansion, PrEP has been made more readily available to populations at risk, resulting in significant reductions in new HIV infections.

The contrast between Georgia and states like Louisiana underscores a broader public health failure. While Medicaid expansion has been proven to improve health outcomes and reduce the spread of HIV, Georgia remains one of the 10 states that have resisted expanding coverage. This resistance leaves the state’s residents at a higher risk of HIV transmission and prevents thousands of people from achieving viral suppression, perpetuating a cycle of preventable infections.

The urgency of this crisis cannot be overstated. Georgia’s decision not to expand Medicaid is contributing to an ongoing public health catastrophe. Without bold action from state leaders and policymakers, the state will continue to fall behind in addressing one of the most pressing healthcare issues of our time.

As the evidence from Louisiana shows, Medicaid expansion is not just a policy choice—it is a life-saving measure. By expanding access to healthcare, Georgia could prevent new infections, improve viral suppression rates, and offer a path forward for thousands of people living with HIV. The stakes are high, and the time for action is now.

The current situation in Georgia should serve as a wake-up call to policymakers and healthcare leaders across the country. As the state grapples with the consequences of inaction, the need for comprehensive healthcare reform becomes clearer with each passing day. Until Georgia expands Medicaid and prioritizes HIV prevention and care, it will continue to suffer the consequences of a public health system that leaves too many behind.

Breaking Barriers: The Role of PrEP in HIV Prevention

PrEP, or pre-exposure prophylaxis, is a critical tool in preventing the spread of HIV. For those at higher risk, particularly in marginalized communities, PrEP offers a way to stay HIV-negative. Yet, too few people who could benefit from this treatment are using it. Barriers such as cost, geographic location, and a lack of healthcare providers familiar with HIV prevention often make it difficult to access.

Take Darrell, a sex worker who faced significant barriers to accessing PrEP in his rural community. Before the Affordable Care Act mandated expanded access, Darrell, who knew he was at higher risk for HIV, couldn’t afford PrEP or find local clinics that offered it.

“I remember feeling like I had no options,” Darrell shares. “I was in an industry where the risk was high, but I didn’t have the resources to protect myself. Once I was able to get on PrEP, everything changed. I’m HIV-negative today, and I’m living my life without fear.”

Darrell’s story is not unique. Thousands of Black Americans, particularly in rural areas, face similar struggles. Even with the Biden administration’s new policy, ensuring access for everyone remains a significant challenge.


Rural America and the Gaps in Healthcare Access

The barriers to healthcare are particularly stark in rural communities.

In these areas, healthcare providers familiar with HIV prevention are few, and geographic isolation makes it harder for people to reach the services they need. For many, even if PrEP is available at no cost, they may still need to travel long distances to find a clinic or pharmacy that offers it.

This problem is compounded by many pharmacies in rural areas lacking the infrastructure to bill for Medicare Part B, which now covers injectable PrEP. The gap in services is a serious barrier to ensuring that rural residents, many of whom are Black or LGBTQ+, can benefit from the new policy.

States like Mississippi and Alabama—which have some of the highest rates of new HIV infections in the U.S.—are prime examples of the challenges rural populations face. In Mississippi, for example, less than 5% of those who could benefit from PrEP are currently using it, reflecting a critical need to address these access gaps.

Dr. Michael Saag from the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s 1917 Clinic highlights how stigma and long distances are key challenges: “People want to avoid being seen at clinics known for HIV care, so many end up traveling to other cities for privacy.” In Mississippi, Dr. Robert Brock of UMMC explains that patients may travel over 50 miles to find the nearest pharmacy or clinic capable of providing HIV treatment.

To address these gaps, programs like mobile testing units and expanded telemedicine have been instrumental in reducing the burden of travel and increasing access to care. Policy changes to better support rural pharmacies and clinics can also help ensure that residents in these underserved regions receive the care they need without the barriers of distance and stigma.

To be continued in Part Two…

“Miles Apart Confronting Stigma and Barriers in HIV Care for Rural America”

Dash Daggs

Community Activist | Business Consultant | Writer Director of Development & CommunicationPower Atlanta Inc.

“Empowering communities, one step at a time, for a future where every voice matters.” Email: poweredbydash@gmail.com

Please read this article because I know you know someone living with HIV. I want to thank Dash for writing this article and giving this update alluding to Public Health. This is so important.

America Without the ACA: A Grim Reality

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), often referred to as Obamacare, has been a cornerstone of American healthcare since its inception. It has provided millions of Americans with access to affordable health insurance, significantly reducing the number of uninsured individuals. But what would happen if the ACA were suddenly repealed, leaving over 30 million people without healthcare coverage? The consequences would be dire and far-reaching.

The Immediate Impact: 30+ Million Without Healthcare

If the ACA were repealed, more than 30 million Americans would lose their health insurance overnight1. This would include individuals who gained coverage through Medicaid expansion, those who purchased insurance through the ACA marketplaces, and young adults who remain on their parents’ plans until age 26. The loss of coverage would be catastrophic for these individuals and their families.

Without insurance, many would be unable to afford necessary medical care. Routine check-ups, preventive services, and treatments for chronic conditions would become financially out of reach. This would lead to a significant increase in untreated illnesses and preventable deaths. Hospitals and clinics would see a surge in emergency room visits, as uninsured individuals seek care for conditions that could have been managed with regular medical attention1.

The Financial Burden: Unaffordable Medical Bills

For those without insurance, medical bills can quickly become overwhelming. A single hospital visit or a major surgery can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Without the ACA, many families would face financial ruin due to medical debt. This would not only affect their ability to pay for healthcare but also impact their overall financial stability, leading to increased rates of bankruptcy and poverty2.

The ripple effects would be felt across the economy. As more people struggle with medical debt, consumer spending would decrease, affecting businesses and slowing economic growth. The healthcare system itself would be strained, with hospitals and clinics facing financial challenges due to an increase in uncompensated care2.

The Importance of State Participation in the ACA Exchange

One of the key components of the ACA is the health insurance exchange, where individuals can purchase affordable health plans. However, not all states have fully embraced the exchange, leaving many residents without access to affordable coverage. It is crucial for every state to participate in the ACA exchange to ensure that all Americans have access to healthcare.

States that do not participate in the exchange are still paying into the system through federal taxes. By not taking advantage of the exchange, these states are essentially leaving money on the table that could be used to provide their residents with affordable health insurance. Participation in the exchange would not only benefit individuals but also strengthen the overall healthcare system by spreading risk and reducing costs3.

A Call to Action

The potential repeal of the ACA highlights the importance of maintaining and expanding access to healthcare. It is essential for policymakers to recognize the devastating impact that losing the ACA would have on millions of Americans. Ensuring that every state participates in the ACA exchange is a critical step in providing comprehensive healthcare coverage for all.

Healthcare is a fundamental human right, and it is the responsibility of our leaders to protect and expand access to it. By working together, we can ensure that no American is left without the care they need and deserve.


What are your thoughts on the potential repeal of the ACA? How do you think it would impact your community? Share your thoughts and join the conversation.

The Impact of Health Care Inequities on Black People: Quality of Life, Economic Loss, and Life Expectancy

Health care inequities have long been a significant issue affecting the Black community in the United States. These disparities not only impact the quality of life but also lead to substantial economic losses and a shorter life expectancy for Black individuals. This blog post delves into the multifaceted effects of these inequities, supported by statistical data and historical context.

Quality of Life

The quality of life for Black people is profoundly affected by health care disparities. Black individuals are more likely to experience chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and asthma at higher rates than their White counterparts1. These conditions often go untreated or are poorly managed due to barriers in accessing quality health care. For instance, Black people are more likely to be uninsured or underinsured, which limits their access to necessary medical services2.

Moreover, the historical mistreatment of Black people in the medical profession has fostered a deep mistrust in the health care system. This mistrust is rooted in events such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, where Black men were left untreated for syphilis to study the disease’s progression3. Such instances contribute to a reluctance to seek medical care, further exacerbating health issues.

Economic Loss

Health care inequities also translate into significant economic losses for the Black community. The cost of untreated or poorly managed chronic conditions can be staggering. Black families often face higher medical expenses and lost income due to illness. Additionally, the lack of access to preventive care means that diseases are often diagnosed at more advanced stages, requiring more expensive and extensive treatments4.

The economic impact extends beyond individual families. The broader economy suffers as well, with increased health care costs and lost productivity. According to a study by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, health disparities cost the U.S. economy approximately $93 billion in excess medical costs and $42 billion in lost productivity per year5.

Life Expectancy

One of the most stark indicators of health care inequities is the difference in life expectancy between Black and White individuals. On average, Black people live nearly five years less than their White counterparts (72.8 years vs. 77.5 years). This gap is a direct result of the cumulative effects of health disparities, including higher rates of infant mortality, maternal mortality, and chronic diseases.

For example, Black infants have a mortality rate more than twice that of White infants (10.6 per 1,000 live births vs. 4.4 per 1,000 live births). Additionally, Black women are nearly three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than White women (39.9 vs. 14.1 per 100,000 live births). These statistics highlight the urgent need for systemic changes in the health care system to address these disparities.

Conclusion

The impact of health care inequities on Black people is profound and far-reaching. These disparities affect the quality of life, lead to significant economic losses, and result in a shorter life expectancy. Addressing these issues requires a concerted effort to dismantle systemic racism in the health care system, improve access to quality care, and rebuild trust within the Black community. Only through such efforts can we hope to achieve health equity and improve the overall well-being of Black individuals.


1KFF – How Present-Day Health Disparities for Black People Are Linked to Past Policies and Events 2Pew Research Center – Black Americans’ Views about Health Disparities, Experiences with Health Care 3KFF – How Present-Day Health Disparities for Black People Are Linked to Past Policies and Events 4Commonwealth Fund – Achieving Racial and Ethnic Equity in U.S. Health Care 5: W.K. Kellogg Foundation – The Business Case for Racial Equity : Pew Research Center – Black Americans’ Views about Health Disparities, Experiences with Health Care : KFF – How Present-Day Health Disparities for Black People Are Linked to Past Policies and Events : KFF – How Present-Day Health Disparities for Black People Are Linked to Past Policies and Events : KFF – How Present-Day Health Disparities for Black People Are Linked to Past Policies and Events

Your comments are welcomed and wanted so please stay engaged

Dr. Richard A. Cross is Building Black Men

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/richardacross/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RichardACross13/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dr.richardacross/